Its approach of pranking two complete strangers at the same time often provides entertainingly contrasting responses. Prank Encounters does have a few more inspired moments. And the victims often appear as indifferent to his big reveal as they are his pranks. Occasionally we see him apparently organising all the chaos from a high-tech mobile base, but it's obvious that each of his commands have already been scripted and thoroughly rehearsed by each actor. Matarazzo is strangely surplus to requirements too. The PI assistant in episode three barely even raises an eyelid despite the fact that he's being confronted by a crazed plastic surgeon who's attacked a colleague, chloroformed a caregiver and kept a lookalike of his dead wife hostage for two months. Others, however, seem entirely nonplussed, perhaps aware that the elaborate set-ups and broad acting by those in on the joke could only ever be pure fiction. Some prank subjects appear genuinely scared at the horror movie-style situation they unwittingly find themselves in – see the wide-eyed insurance investigator trapped in a vehicle being attacked by a Sasquatch in episode two. But there's something slightly disconcerting about the same bear being tied to an infanticide. Sure, the moment when Xavier, the supersized teddy bear she's been blaming various crimes and misdemeanours on, suddenly comes to life is admittedly laugh-out-loud funny. It's a pretty dark set-up for a trivial 24-minute show hosted by a kid from Stranger Things. The first prank, in particular, is based around a 9-year-old girl struggling to deal with the trauma of her older sister falling (or being pushed?) to her death from a balcony. In the first episode, the poor victims consist of a babysitter – who in the middle of her prank handily confirms that she's being employed by a temping agency – and a driver's assistant on a charity pick-up.īut while the premise isn't as tasteless as everyone first thought, you could argue that its execution sometimes is. Sure, you could argue that those scared witless are still being exploited for entertainment purposes, but there's never any suggestion that they've been promised anything other than a one-off odd job. Well, firstly, Matarazzo wasn't telling porkies. If im going to watch people be scared, I need to see them be SCARED.not slightly confused and wondering what the fuck is going on and then yelling "omg scare tactics", its bullshit.įears without tears is no kind of show.I want to see raw human emotion on the screen, I want to see people breakdown and just lose their shit.that is a proper scare show.Related: Netflix responds to backlash against new prank show with Stranger Things' Gaten Matarazzo My problem with scare tactics is this.they don't go nearly far enough in making people scared.if anybody is a fan of these types of shows they will remember a particular japanese show that made a girl break down and cry so fucking bad they had to call an ambulance.NOW THAT IS A was super simple too, they just had multiple ladies dressed like ghosts run around in a parking structure.the difference is they let it go on and on until she broke down. I don't think it is, they just keep running the gag until they get the reaction they need.SOMEONE is always gullible enough.sorry if this is unpopular but im no cynic and its plenty easy to find some idiot to believe the stupid situations they put them in.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |